FACT: Establishment Press Is Broken

Establishment press is broken beyond repair, incapable of nonpartisan thought, action or deed. This very website is full of examples. What exactly is the purpose of legacy media these days? When it was spied upon by Obama, it didn’t care.

When the Obama administration spied on its political opponent, legacy media could not muster the professional integrity to investigate.

In the middle of anarchy, they exposed peaceful protestors, only later realizing it might have hurt their voting bloc.

Legacy Establishment Media (LEM) has solidified itself as an active arm of the Democrat party, often playing the role of Democrat Defense Attorney. It is so easy to identify, simply listen to their questions based on the target. Be it asking Obama what he had on his play list or recently, in the middle of the “laptop from hell” revelations that the Democrat candidate was influence peddling, an October surprise larger than any other… the LEMmings pressed Biden hard about the flavor of his Ice Cream. Yes, it was an exceptional moment for journalism.

Perhaps nothing is more revealing about the LEMmings than the 2020 election. Consider how they reacted to Bush-Gore in 2000. Anyone remember the press talking about how safe the voting ecosystem was? Remember any headlines getting pushed like Twitter does today: “There’s No Evidence of Voter Fraud, U.S. Election Officials Say”

Bush-Gore 2000 was not about wide-spread questionable voting practices that defy mathematical models across the country. It wasn’t even a question about ballot counts in Florida to be specific. No, it was about the counts in Palm Beach County, Broward County and Miami-Dade County. The LEMmings descended like stormtroopers going into full activation protecting the “integrity of US elections.”

An interesting note about what propelled those recounts:

Seven justices agreed that there was an Equal Protection Clause violation in using differing standards of determining a valid vote in different counties, causing an “unequal evaluation of ballots in various respects

Of note, Palm Beach County changed standards for counting dimpled chads several times during the counting process. That is right, “dimpled chads” and thus the creation of chad diviners. Did someone mean to press the piece of thin cardboard but not have the strength to get it done. Don’t worry… chad diviners to the rescue!

Fast-forward and I’ll bet you haven’t heard a single LEMming reference that ruling with respect to the 2020 election. Might it be relevant in an election where some counties eliminated the need for a ballot signature, and some counties extended the voting deadline?

Spray out ballots to everyone in a state based on unclean voter roles and then remove the requirement to validate a signature, extend the vote date beyond deadlines in other counties and states – what could go wrong? This was the plan, and most of it got executed.

Yet, with that background, not a single LEMming found all of this as problematic as a dimpled chad! They didn’t because they are no longer (if they ever were) journalists, they are Democrat Defense Attorneys.

All of that would only be considered the start for a real journalist. Mathematical analysis raises serious questions about the integrity of the 2020 election and election equipment. Beyond the above obvious manual fraud that can be employed, two difference voices raise concerns regarding a review of the ballot counts.

A post on TheDonald.win by user TrumanBlack has given anyone who cares (that would eliminate the LEMmings) raw data showing what appears to be votes changed from President Trump to Biden.

In another online revelation, Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD, the Inventor of Email, Scientist, Engineer, shares the results of his team’s mathematical analysis of four major county votes in Michigan. The analysis raises significant questions about Election Integrity.

Contrasting the straight party line voter with individual candidate votes, his team demonstrated algorithmic patterns of votes being moved from Trump to Biden. They also note many voting systems, include a “weighted race” option. In essence, if utilized, would actually change votes based on weight – exactly what appears to have happened as the data from Michigan is reviewed.

In one election cycle, the LEMmings are exorcised in covering a dimpled chad. In another election cycle elimination of voter signatures, the extension of deadlines beyond election day, the spraying out of ballots to non-sanitized voter lists, 100+ percent voter turnout and review of ballot counts showing a transfer of votes from one candidate to another are not worthy of coverage. The difference is unambiguous, and the reason is party affiliation.

The New York Times did an intense investigation of all of this by, wait for it… picking up the phone!

“The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud”

I’m reminded of a great movie line from Judge Chamberlain Haller:

“I’m not about to revamp the entire judicial process just because you find yourself in the unique position of defending clients who say they didn’t do it.”

LEMmings, if you are no longer capable of doing investigative reporting at least watch a movie.